04-24 – Determinants of relapse risk in AQP4-IgG and seronegative neuromyelitis

04-24
Determinants of relapse risk in AQP4-IgG and seronegative neuromyelitis
Pakeeran Siriratnam
Monash University , Department of Neuroscience, Melbourne, Australia
Download PDF – 04-24
The Abstract
Abstract Body

Introduction:
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare central nervous system autoimmune
condition where most patients harbour antibodies against aquaporin-4, however a minority are
seronegative. Whilst previous studies had identified predictors of relapses in AQP4-IgG NMOSD, a
scarcity of knowledge exists about the seronegative subtype.
Objectives/Aims:
The aim of this study is to characterise the demographic features and relapse risks in AQP4-IgG
NMOSD and seronegative NMOSD.
Methods:
This was a multi-centre, international cohort study using the MSBase database. Relapse risks were
assessed as risk of recurrent relapses using Andersen-Gill (AG) model and time to first relapse using
Cox proportional hazards model. The covariates included demographic factors, clinical characteristics
and treatment exposure. Treatment was assessed as a time-varying covariate and was categorised as
high-efficacy or low efficacy therapies, with multiple sclerosis therapies as reference.
Results:
A total of 398 patients were included in the study; 246 AQP4-IgG NMOSD patients followed up for a
median of 4.2 years and 152 seronegative NMOSD patients followed up for a median of 4.6 years.
Baseline demographic data were closely aligned between both groups. In the AG model, both high efficacy (mostly Rituximab) and low-efficacy (mostly azathioprine) therapies were associated with
relapse reduction. High-efficacy therapy was associated with the highest protection against recurrent
relapse risk in the AQP4-IgG NMOSD (HR 0.27, CI 0.15-0.49, p<0.001) and seronegative NMOSD (HR
0.21, CI 0.08-0.51, p<0.001) groups. In the AQP4-IgG NMOSD group, male sex (HR 0.52, CI 0.34-
0.84, p=0.007) and longer disease duration (HR 0.97, CI 0.95-0.99, p<0.001) were also protective.
Conclusion:
Our results highlight that regardless of antibody status, immunotherapies, particularly high-efficacy
immunotherapies, are exceedingly effective at controlling relapse risks.

Additional Authors
Paul Sanfilippo
Anneke Van Der Walt
Vilija Jokubaitis
Helmut Butzkueven
Saif Huda
Mastura Monif
Additional Institutions
Walton Centre, NHS Trust, UK
The Alfred, Department of Neurology, Melbourne, Australia